Arellano: How the Bass campaign channels one of L.A.'s most infamous mayoral races

With less than a week until Nov. 3, it seems like the Los Angeles mayor's race is Karen Bass' to lose. After a bad debate against challenger Nithya Raman over the summer and the fiasco that was City Hall's response to the Lineage fire, the incumbent had no other way forward but attack, attack, attack.

Now, a poll by the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies and co-sponsored by The Times has the two in a statistical dead heat, with 19% of voters undecided and time running out for both campaigns to grab them. It's a stunning reversal from just a month ago, when the same poll had Raman substantially ahead. Bass barely improved on her abysmal favorability ratings.

But some Angelenos seem willing to hold their noses and cast a ballot for her, because they just don't trust the more liberal alternative. Raman, a democratic socialist who has served on the City Council since 2020, saw her unfavorability rating jump to 50%, as more people got to know her and didn't like what they saw. This isn't the first time voters have swung like this in a mayoral race involving an unpopular incumbent and an upstart representing a new L.

A. In 1969, the candidate with six years on the City Council was Tom Bradley. The mayor, who, like Bass, had served in the California state Assembly and Congress was four years removed from a disastrous response to the Watts riots.

Bradley placed first in the primary and seemed a shoo-in to become L.A.'s first Black mayor in an era when cities across the country were also electing Black mayors.

So Yorty — a former New Dealer turned conservative Democrat — chose the only path to victory. He claimed that “left-wing radicals” who supported the arriviste were salivating to “take over your city.” The nattering negativity worked: He easily beat Bradley.

History doesn’t repeat itself, the adage goes, but it always rhymes. One factor boosting Bass' fortunes: Backers of conservative reality TV star Spencer Pratt, who finished third in the June primary, are trending toward the mayor they loathe, apparently because they hate Raman even more. Part of Raman’s fall is self-inflicted.

She lost her momentum with an October of unforced errors, from awkward television interviews to inadvertently praising the late LAPD Chief Daryl Gates, whose name is still synonymous with Lucifer across swaths of the city. You know you’re having a bad month when you think it’s wise to yell, “Only you can stop fascist liars!” in unison with a progressive influencer, only to walk it back after realizing the influencer had superimposed an image of your opponent on his video.

But don't discount how Bass' camp decided to frame the race. Facing voters who just don’t like their candidate, they long ago stopped focusing on how she would govern the city better in a second term and doubled down on attacking Raman anywhere and everywhere. That strategy owes as much to Yorty’s win as the Beats did to Walt Whitman.

Raman's colleagues on the City Council have trashed her like bullies out of a boarding school novel. Videos and fliers of homeless encampments blooming across L.A.

under a Raman regime are reminiscent of Yorty campaign ads featuring Bradley and the caption, “Will Your City Be Safe With This Man?” Bass — whose usual sunny disposition I've always found a tonic in the toxic world of politics — lashed into Raman during their final debate, offering no real platform and little defense of her record, preferring instead to paint an L.A.

collapsing without her in charge. “Now is not the time," she said at one point, "to turn the city over to Nithya Raman.” Then when, Karen?

The comparison to 1969 isn’t apples to apples, of course. The city’s demographics are vastly different, its politics nowhere near as conservative. L.

A.'s first female Black mayor would never throw racist slurs at Raman, although Bass and her team continue to point out that the India-born council member has lived in L.A.

for only 13 years and thus doesn’t understand the place — a page from Yorty’s troll-tastic playbook. I don't like Bass' tactics, but I get it. When you have nothing to run on but your failures, you have to go nasty against an upstart who offers something new for the city — because fearmongering works when Angelenos know change is on the way but are skittish about what's next.

It happened in 1969, it happened in 2001 when James Hahn beat Antonio Villaraigosa, and it seems to be happening this time around. We’ll see what election day brings, but Raman can take solace in history if she loses. Bradley lost his first mayoral campaign but easily won his rematch against Yorty in 1973, after voters realized the status quo was going to remain the status quo.

Villaraigosa, too, eventually became mayor. “Nothing is as powerful as an idea whose time has come,” goes another cliché of history. Bass might very well cling to her position, but Angelenos still yearn for a visionary to pick them back up from four years of despair under her.

They know she's not it. Let's hope she doesn't become like Yorty in his last term, complaining about haters being unfair and fending off the rebels she can only keep away for so long.